Was Fast and Furious an attempt to ban
Second Amendment?
Katie Pavlich wrote an excellent book
about the scandal and cover-up of the US government's “Fast and
Furious” program under President Obama. On page 22 she quoted Eric
Holder's disagreement with individual gun ownership in the Second
Amendment. Maybe she will also tackle the scandal and cover-up of
the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.
Was video blame for Benghazi attack an
attempt to ban First Amendment?
The testimonies are beginning to shine
a light on the Benghazi cover-up, but was it a setup to try to take
away free speech and/or give internet control to the government?
Obama didn't make any move to help the young Iranians protesting
Ahmadinejad's corrupt re-election campaign, but Obama got the US and
UN involved in taking down Libya's president, and Chris Stevens was a
part of it. Did the US government knowingly placed a homosexual man
in an unstable Muslim country (almost like sending in a Jew) as a
pawn for their desire for more control?
There was a failed assassination
attempt on Britain's ambassador, and other attacks this summer; but
requests for more security were denied. It sounds like king David
telling Joab to place Uriah, Bathsheba's husband, in the thick of
battle and then withdraw from him. The “video” had been up on
Youtube since June, yet somehow it was cast as the sole reason for
the Benghazi murders and Cairo protests on 9/11; as if Muslim hatred
for America wouldn't be emboldened on that anniversary anyway.
Obama and his lackeys repeatedly point
to the video, and Obama cited it six times in his speech to the UN;
but then snippets of truth began to be divulged to the public, and
Obama's team couldn't make the lies about the video stick. The only
thing that makes sense to me is that Obama's team wanted to take over
the internet or Youtube and/or ban “freedom of speech” due to
security issues on their road to total fascism so that Obama could
become dictator of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment